Matthew Yglesisas outlines the arguments made to keep Guantanamo open...
The basic conservative position, as I understand it, is that the very same federal officials who can’t be trusted to prevent a breakout from a military prison in Kansas can be trusted to administer a system of indefinite detention and kangaroo courts fairly. Other arguments I’ve heard people make, apparently with a straight face:
- The fact that the Bush administration has let dangerous terrorists go free means Obama should keep innocent people detained.
- The fact that the Bush administration screwed up the paperwork on detainees shows that there was more wisdom to Bush’s policies than Obama acknowledged on the campaign trail.
- Obama’s promise of change was empty and hypocritical because it will take time to implement his executive orders.
- The “Guantanamo” issue is primarily about the physical location of the facility rather than the legal status or treatment of the detainees.
- Since many liberals live in San Francisco, anyone who thinks it would be ill-advised to transfer prisoners to a museum in the San Francisco Bay that hasn’t been a prison for decades is a hypocrite.
There’s some really out of this world stuff.