Posts
This is noteworthy because Feingold usually votes for the President's nominees because he says they should have the right to choose they work witht. In the past Feingold has voted in favor of John Aschcroft, John Roberts, and Condileeza Rice among others.
Here is Feingold's statement on why he is not supporting Mukasey...
I will vote against the nomination of Judge Mukasey to be the next Attorney General. This was a difficult decision, as Judge Mukasey has many impressive qualities. He is intelligent and experienced and appears to understand the need to depoliticize the Department of Justice and restore its credibility and reputation.At this point in our history, however, the country also needs an Attorney General who will tell the President that he cannot ignore the laws passed by Congress. Unfortunately, Judge Mukasey was unwilling to reject the extreme and dangerous theories of executive power that this administration has put forward.
The nation's top law enforcement officer must be able to stand up to a chief executive who thinks he is above the law. The rule of law is too important to our country's history and to its future to compromise on that bedrock principle.
1 comment:
As most learned in highschool government class, there are 3 seperate but equal branches of government. I would assume that a member of the Senate would be as knowledgeable on that subject as a highschool senior.
No one is above the law, not the President..nor Congress. The last I checked the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and it defines the extent of powers of the three branches, not Congress. While some in Congress may not want to hear it, it is well established Consititutional law that the executive branch has powers independant of congress.
Judge Mukasey's testimony at his hearing and his written answers are legally correct. Again it seems that some in congress are more interested in misrepresenting facts for political points then being intellectually honest.
Post a Comment