Saturday, July 14, 2007

Do they even want us there?

As Iraq policy is being debated in Congress, one question that must be asked is if the Iraqi's even want us there. It is their country after all.

This story on Yahoo News this morning suggests the Iraqi's wouldn't mind us leaving.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Saturday that the Iraqi army and police are capable of keeping security in the country when American troops leave "any time they want," though he acknowledged the forces need further weapons and training.

Others in the Iraqi government have taken it a step further...

But one of his top aides, Hassan al-Suneid, rankled at the assessment, saying the U.S. was treating Iraq like "an experiment in an American laboratory." He sharply criticised the U.S. military, saying it was committing human rights violations, embarassing the Iraqi government with its tactics and cooperating with "gangs of killers" in its campaign against al-Qaida in Iraq.

al-Suneid then added...

....the U.S. authorities have embarrassed al-Maliki' government through acts such as constructing a wall around Baghdad's Sunni neighborhood of Azamiyah and repeated raids on suspected Shiite militiamen in the capital's eastern slum of Sadr City. He said the U.S. use of airstrikes to hit suspected insurgent positions also kills civilians.

"This embarrasses the government in front of its people," he said, calling the civilian deaths a "human rights violation."

Things won't change for the better in Iraqi if the United States is viewed as an occupying force. It doesn't matter what Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or John McCain thinks. It only matters what the Iraqi's think. If they consider us an occupying force then the ability for progress in the country is unattainable. It is that simple. Unfortunately, it is looking more and more like many Iraqi's consider us as occupiers.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Heck States get annoyed when the Federal government tells them what to do...imagine how aggravating it would be if a foreign country did it.

NPR had some great covereage this past week on the Iraqi reaction to the Senate debate over troop withdrawl and the interim report. The consistent theme of statements from those on the ground in Iraq is that the Iraqi's can't and won't have a timeline dictated to them based on D.C. politics. In fact the more the U.S. pushes for "progress" the less likely there will be any meaningful improvement.

If there is one halmark behind democratic political philosophy it is that governments exist by the consent of the goverened. Does it seem to anyone that the Iraqis are consenting...or that anyone in Washington cares whether they consent or not?