Thursday, May 03, 2007

Feingold: After the Veto

Sen. Russ Feingold wrote an article at the Huffington Post yesterday about what Democrats must do after the President vetoed the bill that would fund our troops and set a timetable for their withdrawl.

The ink on the President's veto is barely dry, and already, a lot of Washington insiders - including some Democrats -- are saying Congress should just give in to the President. Never mind how hard people have pushed to bring Congress to this point, when we are finally standing up to the President's disastrous Iraq policy -- they want to give up on the binding language in the bill requiring the President to begin redeploying troops from Iraq.

But that's just letting the President have his way all over again. That's the kind of thinking that got us into this war in the first place, and it's not going to cut it anymore.
If Democrats cave, we are basically in the same position we were in when Congress authorized this war. It is a choice of standing on principle and doing the right thing or giving Bush a pass to keep making the same mistakes he has been making.

Feingold then tells what the next step is and hits the core issue with this bill when he says that this is a real test on what type of Democratic Congress this is. Is it one that changes position when things get tough or is it one that has the backbone to take a strong stand.

The next step to ending the war isn't to give in, but to step up the pressure on the President. I'm pleased to be working with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on a bill to end our open-ended military commitment in Iraq. Now that the President has rejected the will of the American people with this veto, our bill, or some other proposal to end funding for a failed policy, should be the next step to end the war.

We are in the middle of a real test for the new Democratic Congress. No matter what Washington insiders say about cutting a deal or scoring political points, we need to hang tough to get our troops out of Iraq. The President has refused to budge on his Iraq policy from the beginning -- he has repeatedly gotten his way, and our country has paid a terrible price for that. Today, 150,000 U.S. troops are in the middle of a civil war that is straining our military, and hurting our ability to go after al Qaeda worldwide. Too much is at stake for us to back down -- the new Congress has got to stand firm. It's a time to listen to the American people and finally start to bring our troops out of Iraq. Their lives and our national security depend on it.

No comments: